Console Login
Home / Blog / Security & Compliance / Automating Server Hardening: Compliance Strategies for Norwegian CTOs (2015 Edition)
Security & Compliance 1 views

Automating Server Hardening: Compliance Strategies for Norwegian CTOs (2015 Edition)

@

Automating Server Hardening: Compliance Strategies for Norwegian CTOs

If you are currently hosting sensitive Norwegian user data on US-owned servers, you should be sweating. The buzz in Brussels—and here in Oslo—is that the Safe Harbor agreement is on its last legs. The pending judgment in the Schrems case could invalidate data transfers to the US practically overnight. If that happens, data sovereignty stops being a buzzword and becomes a legal survival requirement.

But geography is only half the battle. As a CTO, I see too many teams treating security as a one-time setup script run by a junior sysadmin. That doesn't fly with Datatilsynet (The Norwegian Data Protection Authority). In 2015, if your infrastructure isn't defined as code, you are arguably already non-compliant.

Here is how we automate security compliance to satisfy strict Norwegian standards, ensuring your servers aren't just secure on day one, but remain compliant on day five hundred.

The End of the "Snowflake" Server

The biggest enemy of compliance is the "Snowflake" server—a machine manually configured, tweaked, and patched until it resembles nothing else in your fleet. You cannot audit what you cannot reproduce.

We need to move from manual SSH sessions to configuration management. While Puppet and Chef have their place, Ansible (currently version 1.9) has become my tool of choice for rapid orchestration because it requires no agent on the remote nodes. It uses the SSH keys you already manage.

Step 1: Hardening SSH via Playbook

First, we lock the front door. The default SSH configuration on most Linux distros is too permissive for an environment handling financial or personal data. We need to disable root login, enforce Protocol 2, and kill password authentication entirely.

Here is a snippet from a standard hardening playbook I deploy to every fresh CoolVDS instance:

- name: Secure SSH Configuration
  lineinfile:
    dest: /etc/ssh/sshd_config
    regexp: "{{ item.regexp }}"
    line: "{{ item.line }}"
    state: present
  with_items:
    - { regexp: '^PermitRootLogin', line: 'PermitRootLogin no' }
    - { regexp: '^PasswordAuthentication', line: 'PasswordAuthentication no' }
    - { regexp: '^Protocol', line: 'Protocol 2' }
    - { regexp: '^AllowUsers', line: 'AllowUsers deploy_user' }
  notify: restart ssh
Pro Tip: After the POODLE vulnerability last year (2014), you must ensure you aren't allowing legacy SSLv3 or weak ciphers anywhere. In your web server configs (Nginx/Apache), explicitly disable them. It's a quick flag, but missing it ruins your audit score.

Virtualization Matters: KVM vs. Containers

There is a lot of hype around containers right now (Docker, LXC). They are fantastic for development velocity. However, from a strict security and compliance perspective, they share the host kernel. If a vulnerability exists in the kernel (like the recent venom bug in virtualization stacks), the isolation barrier is thinner.

For production databases and compliance-heavy workloads, KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is the superior choice. It provides hardware-level virtualization.

Feature OpenVZ / Containers KVM (CoolVDS Standard)
Kernel Isolation Shared (Riskier) Isolated (Secure)
Resource Allocation Burstable (Noisy Neighbors) Dedicated RAM/CPU
Custom Encryption Limited support (e.g., LUKS) Full Disk Encryption supported

At CoolVDS, we exclusively use KVM for our Norwegian nodes. This allows you to implement Full Disk Encryption (LUKS) on your partitions—a critical safeguard if you are storing sensitive health or financial data. You cannot easily do that on a shared-kernel container.

Audit Trails with `auditd`

Compliance isn't just about prevention; it's about detection. If a file containing user IDs is accessed, you need a record of it. On CentOS 7, the auditd subsystem is your best friend. It hooks into the kernel to log specific system calls.

A basic rule to watch for unauthorized access to the /etc/passwd file looks like this:

auditctl -w /etc/passwd -p wa -k identity_changes

Combine this with a remote logging server. If an attacker compromises your VPS, the first thing they will do is wipe the local logs. By shipping logs instantly to a secondary CoolVDS storage instance over our private internal network (which incurs zero bandwidth costs), you preserve the forensic evidence required by auditors.

The "Data Residency" Advantage

Technical controls are useless if the legal framework underneath you collapses. With the Safe Harbor status in jeopardy, the safest place for Norwegian data is, unsurprisingly, Norway.

Latency is the other factor. Routing traffic from Oslo to a datacenter in Frankfurt or Amsterdam adds 20-30ms. Routing it to a US east coast server adds 90ms+. By hosting on CoolVDS infrastructure located directly in Oslo, you are hitting the NIX (Norwegian Internet Exchange) with sub-5ms latency. Speed is a feature, but for us, data sovereignty is the product.

Your Next Move

The era of "security by obscurity" is dead. The era of "security by policy" is ending. We are in the era of "security by code."

Don't wait for the lawyers to panic about the Safe Harbor ruling. Migrate your critical workloads to a jurisdiction you can trust and a platform that supports rigorous isolation.

Deploy a KVM-based, compliance-ready VPS in Oslo today. Start your CoolVDS instance now.

/// TAGS

/// RELATED POSTS

The Perimeter is Dead: Implementing Zero-Trust Security on Your VPS After the Safe Harbor Collapse

With the EU-US Safe Harbor agreement invalidated today, the 'castle and moat' security strategy is o...

Read More →

Automating Compliance: Why Manual Hardening is Killing Your Audit Strategy

With the Safe Harbor framework crumbling, relying on manual server hardening is a liability. Learn h...

Read More →

Container Security in 2015: Stop Handing Root Access to Your Host

Docker is revolutionizing deployment, but default configurations are a security nightmare. Learn how...

Read More →

Server Hardening & Compliance: Automating Security for the Norwegian Cloud

Stop managing security with spreadsheets. We explore automating CentOS 7 hardening using Ansible to ...

Read More →

The Perimeter is Dead: Implementing Zero-Trust Security in 2015

The 'castle and moat' security strategy is failing. We explore how to implement Google's BeyondCorp-...

Read More →

Automating Security Baselines: Why Manual Hardening is a Liability in 2015

Manual server hardening is a critical risk. Learn how to automate security baselines using Ansible o...

Read More →
← Back to All Posts