Console Login
Home / Blog / Database Administration / Optimizing MySQL 5.1 Performance for High-Load Norwegian Web Portals
Database Administration 0 views

Optimizing MySQL 5.1 Performance for High-Load Norwegian Web Portals

@

Stop Letting Default Configs Kill Your Uptime

It starts with a slowdown. Then, the dreaded Too many connections error appears in your logs. Your client in Oslo calls screaming that their e-commerce store is down during a campaign. You check top and see MySQL eating 150% CPU. Panic sets in.

Most System Administrators in 2009 are still deploying the default my.cnf that comes with Red Hat or Debian. That configuration is designed for a system with 64MB of RAM, not the modern multi-gigabyte production servers we run today. If you are running a high-traffic site on default settings, you aren't an admin; you're a gambler.

Let's fix this. We are going to look at the transition from MyISAM to InnoDB, memory allocation, and why the underlying storage of your VPS provider—specifically the disk I/O—is usually the silent killer.

The Engine War: MyISAM vs. InnoDB

For years, MyISAM was the default storage engine in MySQL. It is fast for reads, but it has a fatal flaw: Table-level locking. If one user writes to the orders table, MyISAM locks the entire table. Every other user trying to buy something has to wait.

On a busy site, this queue creates a pile-up. The solution is InnoDB. It supports row-level locking. One user updates row #45, and everyone else can still read row #46. In MySQL 5.1 (the current standard), you often have to enable the InnoDB plugin explicitly to get the best performance.

Check your tables:

SELECT table_name, engine FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = 'your_database';

If you see MyISAM on your heavy write tables, convert them immediately:

ALTER TABLE your_table ENGINE=InnoDB;

Tuning my.cnf for the Real World

The configuration file is usually located at /etc/my.cnf on CentOS or /etc/mysql/my.cnf on Debian. Open it up. We need to change how MySQL uses RAM.

1. innodb_buffer_pool_size

This is the single most important setting for InnoDB. It determines how much data and indexes are cached in memory. If this is too low, your database has to read from the physical disk for every query. Disk is slow. RAM is fast.

Pro Tip: On a dedicated database server, set this to 70-80% of your total RAM. If you have a 4GB VPS from CoolVDS, allocate about 2.5GB to 3GB here.
innodb_buffer_pool_size = 2G

2. query_cache_size

There is a lot of debate about the Query Cache. For read-heavy sites (like WordPress blogs or forums), it's a lifesaver. It stores the result of a SELECT statement. If the exact same query comes in, MySQL serves it from RAM without parsing SQL.

However, don't set it too high, or the overhead of maintaining the cache becomes a bottleneck. 64MB or 128MB is usually the sweet spot.

query_cache_size = 64M
query_cache_type = 1

3. innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit

By default, this is set to 1, meaning MySQL writes to the disk after every single transaction to ensure ACID compliance. This is safe, but IO-intensive. If you can tolerate losing 1 second of data in the event of a total server crash (kernel panic or power loss), set this to 2.

Changing this from 1 to 2 can improve write performance by 10x on standard hard drives.

innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 2

The Hardware Bottleneck: Why IOPS Matter

You can tune your config for days, but if your server is fighting for disk access, it won't matter. This is the dark secret of the hosting industry. Many providers oversell their nodes, packing hundreds of OpenVZ containers onto a single SATA drive.

When a neighbor starts a backup, your database latency spikes. You see this as "I/O Wait" in your CPU graphs.

This is where architecture decisions like those made at CoolVDS become relevant. We rely on KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) hardware virtualization. Unlike container-based hosting, KVM provides better isolation. More importantly, using high-speed SAS 15k RPM RAID arrays (and testing early Enterprise SSDs) ensures that your fsync operations don't get stuck in a queue behind someone else's PHP script.

The Norwegian Context: Latency and Law

If your primary user base is in Norway, hosting in the US is a mistake. The speed of light is a hard limit. A packet from Oslo to Texas and back takes ~130ms. From Oslo to a local datacenter, it takes ~5ms. For a database-driven application that makes 20 queries to load a page, that latency adds up to seconds of delay.

Furthermore, we have the Personopplysningsloven (Personal Data Act) and the Data Inspectorate (Datatilsynet) to consider. Keeping data within the EEA/Norway simplifies compliance significantly compared to navigating the US Safe Harbor framework.

Summary

Performance isn't magic. It's physics and configuration.

  • Move high-traffic tables to InnoDB.
  • Set innodb_buffer_pool_size to utilize your available RAM.
  • Ensure your hosting provider isn't starving you on Disk I/O.

If you are tired of debugging slow queries on oversold hardware, it might be time to test your setup on a platform built for stability. Spin up a CoolVDS instance near the NIX (Norwegian Internet Exchange) and see what proper I/O throughput does for your load times.

/// TAGS

/// RELATED POSTS

MySQL Performance Tuning in 2009: Surviving the Slashdot Effect

Is your database locking up under load? Stop blaming PHP. We dive deep into MySQL 5.1 tuning, the My...

Read More →

MySQL 5.1 vs. PostgreSQL 8.4: The Nordic SysAdmin's Dilemma in 2009

With Oracle's pending acquisition of Sun Microsystems, the LAMP stack landscape is shifting. We benc...

Read More →

MySQL 5.1 Performance Tuning: Surviving the Digg Effect on a VPS

Is your database locking up under load? Forget throwing more RAM at the problem. Here is the battle-...

Read More →

MySQL Performance Tuning: Stop Your Database From Choking on Traffic (2009 Edition)

Is your database locking up under load? Learn how to optimize MySQL 5.1 on CentOS, tune your my.cnf ...

Read More →

MySQL 5.1 vs PostgreSQL 8.3: The Database Architect's Dilemma in 2009

With Oracle's acquisition of Sun Microsystems shaking the open source world, we analyze the technica...

Read More →
← Back to All Posts