Console Login

Zen 5 in the Datacenter: Why We Deployed AMD Ryzen 9000 Series for High-Performance VDS

Zen 5 in the Datacenter: Why Ryzen 9000 is Eating EPYC’s Lunch for High-Frequency Workloads

Stop paying for 64 cores you do not use. There is a persistent myth in the hosting industry that "Enterprise" hardware (Xeon Gold, EPYC Genoa) is automatically superior to "Consumer" hardware for every workload. That is a lie kept alive to justify inflated SLAs.

If you are running a monolithic Magento store, a high-traffic WordPress site, or a Game Server, your bottleneck is almost never core count. It is single-thread performance and memory latency. With the release of the AMD Ryzen 9000 series (Zen 5 architecture) late last year, the gap has not just closed; it has inverted. We recently swapped out a cluster of older Xeon servers for Ryzen 9 9950X nodes at our Oslo facility. The results forced us to rewrite our internal provisioning scripts.

This is not a marketing brochure. This is a technical breakdown of why Zen 5 matters for your VDS, how to tune the Linux kernel for it, and why we made it the standard at CoolVDS.

The Architecture: Zen 5 vs. The World

By April 2025, the dust has settled on the Zen 5 launch. The architectural improvements over Zen 4 are significant for server environments, specifically regarding IPC (Instructions Per Clock) and AVX-512 execution. Unlike the previous generation where AVX-512 was handled via double-pumping 256-bit paths, Zen 5 handles full 512-bit data paths. For databases conducting complex vector calculations or heavy compression tasks (like Zstd backups), this is free performance.

But the real killer is the cache hierarchy. The L1 and L2 cache bandwidth has doubled. For a PHP application, which is notoriously "branchy" and cache-sensitive, this translates directly to lower Time to First Byte (TTFB).

Pro Tip: Most hosting providers cap your CPU frequency to save power. We do not. On CoolVDS, the Ryzen 9000 cores are governed by the `performance` governor, not `powersave` or `schedutil`. We rely on Norway's efficient hydropower and ambient cooling to manage the thermals, not artificial throttling.

The Benchmark: MySQL 8.4 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS

We ran a standard `sysbench` OLTP read/write test. The comparison was between a standard cloud instance (Xeon Gold 63xx, equivalent vCores) and a CoolVDS NVMe instance powered by Ryzen 9950X.

Test Environment:

  • OS: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (Noble Numbat)
  • Kernel: 6.8.0-generic
  • Database: MySQL 8.4
  • Storage: NVMe Gen5 (PCIe 5.0)
# The command used for the stress test
sysbench oltp_read_write --table-size=1000000 --mysql-db=test --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=coolvds --threads=16 run
Metric Standard Cloud (Xeon) CoolVDS (Ryzen 9950X) Difference
Transactions per sec (TPS) 4,250 9,820 +131%
Avg Latency 18.4ms 6.1ms -66%
99th Percentile Latency 45ms 12ms -73%

The lower latency on the Ryzen 9000 isn't just about the CPU. It is the combination of Zen 5's IPC and PCIe 5.0 NVMe storage. When your database isn't waiting on I/O wait, the CPU can actually do its job.

Kernel Tuning for Zen 5

Merely renting a Ryzen server isn't enough. You need to tell the Linux kernel how to treat it. The default scheduler in many distros is optimized for "fairness" across many weak cores, not raw throughput on strong cores. Here is the configuration we apply to our base images.

1. CPU Governor & P-States

Modern AMD processors use the `amd-pstate` driver. By April 2025, this driver has matured significantly in Kernel 6.8+. You want to force the active mode to prioritize performance over power efficiency.

# Check current driver
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_driver
# Output should be: amd-pstate-epp

# Force performance preference
echo performance | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/energy_performance_preference

2. Numa Balancing

While Ryzen 9000 is technically a monolith from a software perspective (unlike dual-socket systems), the CCD layout can still introduce minor latency if processes bounce between CCDs. For strict latency-sensitive applications (like Redis or high-frequency trading bots), we recommend pinning processes.

# Disable automatic NUMA balancing if you are manually pinning (cpuset)
sysctl -w kernel.numa_balancing=0

3. Network Stack Optimization (sysctl.conf)

With the 10Gbps uplinks we use at CoolVDS to connect to NIX (Norwegian Internet Exchange), the default TCP buffers are too small. This is crucial for file streaming or backups.

# /etc/sysctl.conf optimization for high-speed links
net.core.rmem_max = 16777216
net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = bbr
net.core.default_qdisc = fq

Note: We use BBR (Bottleneck Bandwidth and Round-trip propagation time) congestion control. In 2025, it remains the standard for handling packet loss gracefully on public networks.

The "Noisy Neighbor" Problem

This is where the architecture of the hosting platform matters more than the raw chip. In a containerized environment (like shared Kubernetes clusters), you are often fighting for CPU time slices. Even if the underlying CPU is a Ryzen 9950X, if the hypervisor overcommits the CPU by 400%, your performance will be inconsistent.

At CoolVDS, we use KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) with strict resource isolation. When you buy 4 vCores of Ryzen 9000, those cycles are reserved. We do not overcommit CPU on our Performance Tier. This is why our Steal Time (the % of time your VM waits for the hypervisor) is consistently near 0.0%.

You can check this yourself on any server:

# Install iostat
apt-get install sysstat -y

# Watch steal time (%steal column)
iostat -c 1 5

If `%steal` is above 1.0% on a regular basis, move hosts.

Data Sovereignty & Local Latency

Hardware is physics, but location is law. Operating out of Norway offers two distinct advantages in 2025:

  1. GDPR & Schrems II Compliance: With the ongoing scrutiny of US-based cloud providers, hosting data within the EEA (European Economic Area) on Norwegian soil provides a legal safety net that US hyperscalers struggle to guarantee.
  2. Latency to Northern Europe: Light speed is finite. If your users are in Oslo, Stockholm, or Copenhagen, hosting in Frankfurt adds 15-25ms of round-trip time. Hosting in Oslo reduces this to <3ms.

Conclusion

The AMD Ryzen 9000 series is not just a "gaming chip." In the context of 2025's web infrastructure, it is the most cost-effective way to scale PHP, Python, and Node.js applications that rely on single-thread speed. You do not need a $10,000/month Enterprise cluster. You need modern architecture, properly tuned.

Stop letting legacy hardware bottleneck your growth. Deploy a Ryzen 9000 NVMe instance on CoolVDS today and see your TTFB drop.