We use cookies and similar technologies to improve your experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. You can manage your preferences or learn more in our Privacy Policy.
Privacy & Cookie Settings
We respect your privacy and give you control over your data. Choose which cookies you want to allow:
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be disabled. They are set in response to actions made by you such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms.
These cookies help us understand how visitors interact with our website by collecting and reporting information anonymously. This helps us improve our services.
Providers: Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics (privacy-friendly)
These cookies are used to track visitors across websites to display relevant advertisements and measure campaign effectiveness.
Providers: LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Reddit
These cookies enable the website to remember choices you make (such as your language preference or region) to provide enhanced, more personalized features.
Your Privacy Rights
Right to Access: You can request a copy of your personal data
Right to Deletion: You can request deletion of your data
Right to Object: You can object to processing of your data
Right to Portability: You can request your data in a portable format
The 'Dirty COW' exploit woke everyone up. Here is a battle-tested guide to locking down containers on Linux, why KVM is mandatory for true isolation, and how to navigate Norwegian data privacy in late 2016.
A battle-hardened comparison of the new Docker Swarm Mode and Kubernetes 1.4. We analyze performance, complexity, and why your underlying VPS IOPS matter more than your scheduler.
As 2016 draws to a close, the container orchestration battle heats up. We benchmark Docker Swarm Mode against the new Kubernetes 1.4 to see which stack handles production loads without melting your Norwegian VPS.
It is October 2016, and everyone is rushing to containerize. But default Docker settings are a security nightmare waiting to happen. Here is how to harden your stack using namespaces, capabilities, and KVM isolation.
It is late 2016, and the battle for container dominance has shifted from the runtime to the cluster. We benchmark Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Mesos to see which solution actually survives production workloads in the Norwegian market.
Docker is not a virtualization strategy; it is a delivery mechanism. We dissect kernel namespaces, capability dropping, and why running containers on KVM-backed infrastructure is the only way to satisfy Norwegian compliance standards.
It's September 2016, and Docker is everywhere. But most deployments in Norway are fundamentally insecure. Here is the battle-hardened guide to locking down your containers before you leak data.
Running Docker as root is a ticking time bomb. This guide covers essential container security hardening, from dropping Linux capabilities to enabling user namespaces, specifically tailored for Norwegian infrastructure standards.
Transitioning from monolith to microservices requires more than just code splitting. We analyze Service Discovery, API Gateways with Nginx, and the critical role of low-latency infrastructure in Norway.
It is July 2016, and Docker 1.12 has just dropped. But before you deploy Swarm mode, understand why running containers as root is a disaster waiting to happen. A deep dive into capabilities, CoW filesystems, and Norwegian data sovereignty.
We benchmark the complexity and performance of Kubernetes 1.2 against Docker Swarm and Mesos. Discover why raw infrastructure latency matters more than your orchestration tool choice for Nordic deployments.
It is 2016, and Docker is eating the world. But most implementations I see in Norway are wide-open security nightmares. Here is how to lock down your containers on Ubuntu 16.04 and CentOS 7 before you get hit.
It’s 2016, and containers are eating the world. But if you are blindly running `docker run` as root, you are inviting disaster. Here is the battle-hardened guide to locking down containers on Norwegian infrastructure.
Container adoption is exploding, but default configurations leave you vulnerable. We dissect Docker 1.10 security features, user namespaces, and why KVM isolation remains critical for Norwegian data compliance post-Safe Harbor.
Your build server is the heartbeat of deployment. If it lags, you bleed money. We dissect how I/O bottlenecks kill CI/CD performance and how to fix it using Jenkins tuning, Docker OverlayFS, and local Norwegian infrastructure.
We compare the leading container orchestration tools of 2016 for the Nordic market. Learn why 'works on my machine' fails in production and how to build a resilient stack on KVM-based CoolVDS infrastructure.
It is 2016, and the monolith is dying. Learn how to deploy scalable microservices using Docker 1.10, Nginx, and Consul without drowning in complexity. We cover the architecture, the config, and why hardware selection is the silent killer of distributed systems.
Moving from monoliths to microservices? Don't let public cloud I/O wait kill your performance. We dive deep into Docker networking, NVMe storage benefits, and why local KVM instances in Oslo beat generic cloud hosting.
Docker is revolutionizing deployment, but its default configuration is a security minefield. We dive into kernel capabilities, user namespaces, and why KVM isolation is non-negotiable for Norwegian data compliance in 2016.
A battle-hardened comparison of container orchestration tools available in early 2016. We analyze Kubernetes 1.1, Docker Swarm, and Mesos, focusing on infrastructure requirements, Safe Harbor compliance, and deploying on KVM-based VPS in Norway.
Docker 1.9 is changing the game, but running containers as root is a recipe for disaster. Here is the battle-tested guide to hardening your stack, surviving the 'Safe Harbor' collapse, and why KVM is your only safety net.
The container ecosystem in late 2015 is a battlefield. We benchmark Docker Swarm against the newly released Kubernetes 1.1 to determine which tool belongs on your production servers in Norway.
With the recent release of Docker 1.9 and Swarm 1.0, the container orchestration battle has intensified. We benchmark Swarm against Google's Kubernetes and Apache Mesos to see which solution truly belongs in your production stack—and why your underlying hardware might be the bottleneck you ignored.
Docker 1.9 just changed the game, but managing containers at scale is still a battlefield. We pit Kubernetes 1.1 against Swarm and Mesos to find the best stack for Norwegian infrastructure post-Safe Harbor.
Your build server is the bottleneck. In the wake of the Safe Harbor invalidation, we analyze how moving Jenkins slaves to NVMe-backed KVM instances in Norway not only solves compliance headaches but crushes build times by 40%.
With the recent invalidation of Safe Harbor and the explosion of container adoption, default Docker configurations are a liability. We analyze kernel isolation, capability dropping, and why running containers on KVM-based VPS is the only sane choice for Norwegian data.
With the recent fall of Safe Harbor, data sovereignty is critical. We dissect practical Docker security hardening, from dropping kernel capabilities to ensuring true isolation with KVM.
With the EU Safe Harbor ruling invalidating US data transfers, hosting your build pipeline in Norway is no longer optional—it's survival. We dive into the Jenkins Workflow plugin (the future 2.0 standard) to replace fragile UI configurations with robust code.
Containerization is sweeping through Norwegian dev teams, but the default settings are a security nightmare. Here is how to lock down Docker 1.8 without sacrificing agility.
Navigating the nascent container orchestration wars of 2015. We benchmark Docker Swarm, the newly released Kubernetes 1.0, and Apache Mesos to see which stack belongs on your Norwegian VPS infrastructure.